• Post Reply Bookmark Topic Watch Topic
  • New Topic
programming forums Java Mobile Certification Databases Caching Books Engineering Micro Controllers OS Languages Paradigms IDEs Build Tools Frameworks Application Servers Open Source This Site Careers Other Pie Elite all forums
this forum made possible by our volunteer staff, including ...
Marshals:
  • Campbell Ritchie
  • Jeanne Boyarsky
  • Ron McLeod
  • Paul Clapham
  • Liutauras Vilda
Sheriffs:
  • paul wheaton
  • Rob Spoor
  • Devaka Cooray
Saloon Keepers:
  • Stephan van Hulst
  • Tim Holloway
  • Carey Brown
  • Frits Walraven
  • Tim Moores
Bartenders:
  • Mikalai Zaikin

Eeceptions

 
Ranch Hand
Posts: 42
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
Hi all !!!
when catching multiple exception the class hierarchy of exception is imortant i mean more specific must come b4
is this also true when we declare in throws statement
 
Greenhorn
Posts: 3
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
No, when a method is declared to throw a number of Exceptions, there is no requirement to list these in any particular order of precedence. Generally though, you should try and throw as specifically as you can to help the client programmer and make the code cleaner and easier to read. On the other hand, though, if you have a method that throws five different exceptions that are all, say, sub-classes of IOException, it is better to simply say throws IOException, and then to catch the specific sub-classes in the calling code. Hope this is of some use.
Regards,
Steve
 
All of the following truths are shameless lies. But what about this tiny ad:
a bit of art, as a gift, that will fit in a stocking
https://gardener-gift.com
reply
    Bookmark Topic Watch Topic
  • New Topic