• Post Reply Bookmark Topic Watch Topic
  • New Topic
programming forums Java Mobile Certification Databases Caching Books Engineering Micro Controllers OS Languages Paradigms IDEs Build Tools Frameworks Application Servers Open Source This Site Careers Other Pie Elite all forums
this forum made possible by our volunteer staff, including ...
Marshals:
  • Campbell Ritchie
  • Jeanne Boyarsky
  • Ron McLeod
  • Paul Clapham
  • Liutauras Vilda
Sheriffs:
  • paul wheaton
  • Rob Spoor
  • Devaka Cooray
Saloon Keepers:
  • Stephan van Hulst
  • Tim Holloway
  • Carey Brown
  • Frits Walraven
  • Tim Moores
Bartenders:
  • Mikalai Zaikin

Jxam question 30

 
Ranch Hand
Posts: 102
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
Given the following definition:
String s = null;
Which code fragment will cause an exception of type NullPointerException to be thrown.
1.if ((s != null) & (s.length()>0))
2.if ((s != null) && (s.length()>0))
3.if ((s != null) | (s.length()>0))
4.if ((s != null) || (s.length()>0))
5.None of the above.
Answer given are 1,2,3,4
Explaination for answers are given below.
For the following, LHS is left-hand side, RHS = right hand side.
Answer 1 must be fully evaluated. The LHS is true and so the RHS needs to be evaluated to ensure the entire expression is true. This is an AND operation, and if the LHS is true, then the RHS must be evaluated for the expression to be true.
Answer 2 is the same as above. Both sides need to be evaluated for an AND expression to be true (if the LHS is true, that is)..

Answer 3 must be fully evaluated because an OR expression is only true if one or the other is true, but not both. Therefore, since the LHS is true, the RHS must be evaluated.
Answer 4 is similar to answer 3 above.
Correct me if i am wrong here, The explanation is correct for the answer 3 because | is not a short circuit operator hence both the expressions will be evaluated but answer 4, the || is a short circuit operator and once the first expression is true it should not evaluate the other expression because true OR false is always true and not as explained above which says true OR true is false. and further true XOR true is false
Can anyone explain to me about this
Thanks in advance
Kareem
 
Ranch Hand
Posts: 3271
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
This doesn't seem right to me. If you check out §15.24 Conditional-Or Operator || in the JLS, you'll find the following text:


The || operator is like | (�15.22.2), but evaluates its right-hand operand only if the value of its left-hand operand is false.


Going back to the referenced section, §15.22.2 Boolean Logical Operators &, ^, and |, you find the following text:


For |, the result value is false if both operand values are false; otherwise, the result is true.


It sounds to me that the explanation for number 3 is an explanation of an XOR operator, ^, even though the answer uses an OR operator, |.
Therefore, I believe the correct answer should be 1, 2, and 3, but not 4.
Someone please corret me if I'm overlooking something.
Corey
 
Author & Gold Digger
Posts: 7617
6
IntelliJ IDE Java
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
4 will also throw a NullPointerException because the left operand is false and thus the right operand has to be evaluated. Since s is null s.length() will throw a NullPointerException
 
Kareem Qureshi
Ranch Hand
Posts: 102
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
I agree with Mc but i wrote this test class and it gives me null pointer exception.
class Test{
public static void main(String [] s1){
Test t = new Test();
String s = null;
if((s != null) || (s.length() > 0))
System.out.println("Hello");
else
System.out.println("Bye");
}
}
I am confused
Thanks in advance
Kareem
 
Kareem Qureshi
Ranch Hand
Posts: 102
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
Thanks val it was pretty silly to miss that first expression itself is false
 
Bartender
Posts: 2205
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator

Originally posted by Kareem Qureshi:
Given the following definition:
String s = null;
Which code fragment will cause an exception of type NullPointerException to be thrown.
1.if ((s != null) & (s.length()>0))
2.if ((s != null) && (s.length()>0))
3.if ((s != null) | (s.length()>0))
4.if ((s != null) || (s.length()>0))
5.None of the above.
Answer given are 1,2,3,4
Explaination for answers are given below.
For the following, LHS is left-hand side, RHS = right hand side.
Answer 1 must be fully evaluated. The LHS is true and so the RHS needs to be evaluated to ensure the entire expression is true. This is an AND operation, and if the LHS is true, then the RHS must be evaluated for the expression to be true.


Answer 1 is correct


Answer 2 is the same as above. Both sides need to be evaluated for an AND expression to be true (if the LHS is true, that is)..


This must be where the author started smoking crack. NO,both sides do not need to be evaluated. && is a short-circuit operator, meaning it will not evaluate the RHS operator if it doesn't need to. Since s == null, s!=null is FALSE, so the entire statement is FALSE, and the RHS is not evaluated. Answer 2 is legal code that will not throw an exception


Answer 3 must be fully evaluated because an OR expression is only true if one or the other is true, but not both. Therefore, since the LHS is true, the RHS must be evaluated.


Like Corey mentioned, this seems to be describing exclusive or (^) and not or (|). This supports my crack-smoking theory.


Answer 4 is similar to answer 3 above.

.
More crack. Although it is true that both sides have to be evaluated, since the LHS is false, but the RHS could be true...but it will in fact throw a NullPointerException because s is null.

So my answers are 1,3, and 4, since they all throw NullPointerExceptions, because the RHS tries to invoke a method on a null reference. 2 is not a correct answer, because it will NOT throw a NullPointerException, since it uses a short-circuit && operator, and the RHS is never evaluated.
[ March 19, 2002: Message edited by: Rob Ross ]
 
Kareem Qureshi
Ranch Hand
Posts: 102
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
Still i feel that explaination given is wrong.
Kareem
 
Corey McGlone
Ranch Hand
Posts: 3271
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
Oops!
Thanks, Val. I misread. Indeed, the fourth one will throw a NullPointerException due to the fact that the left hand operand is false.
The variable s is null so (s != null) will return false. Therefore, the right hand side is also evaluated.
However, I still don't agree with the explination of 3 because it sounds like they're talking about XOR, rather than OR.
Corey
 
Valentin Crettaz
Author & Gold Digger
Posts: 7617
6
IntelliJ IDE Java
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
with 3 the bottom line is that it uses non-short-circuit operator and that both operands will be evaluated, thus since s is null the RHS will throw a NullPointerException
As for 2, Rob is right, 2 is not a correct answer since the RHS will not be evaluated
 
Kareem Qureshi
Ranch Hand
Posts: 102
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
Rob you are right because && is short circuit operator so the 2 expression is not even reached so no nullpointer exception (more errors in exam)
Kareem
reply
    Bookmark Topic Watch Topic
  • New Topic