• Post Reply Bookmark Topic Watch Topic
  • New Topic
programming forums Java Mobile Certification Databases Caching Books Engineering Micro Controllers OS Languages Paradigms IDEs Build Tools Frameworks Application Servers Open Source This Site Careers Other Pie Elite all forums
this forum made possible by our volunteer staff, including ...
Marshals:
  • Campbell Ritchie
  • Jeanne Boyarsky
  • Ron McLeod
  • Paul Clapham
  • Liutauras Vilda
Sheriffs:
  • paul wheaton
  • Rob Spoor
  • Devaka Cooray
Saloon Keepers:
  • Stephan van Hulst
  • Tim Holloway
  • Carey Brown
  • Frits Walraven
  • Tim Moores
Bartenders:
  • Mikalai Zaikin

SCEA Part 2 - Class diagram

 
Greenhorn
Posts: 18
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
Hello all:

Please clarify the following:
1. Should parent-child relationship (generalization relationship association) be shown in analysis class diagram (in particular, SCEA PART 2 - class diagram)? I have a scenario in my project for class diagram where a composite pattern is a good fit which is based on parent-child relationship. I'm asking for this clarification as I think parent-child concept is to be presented as part of design and not analysis phase, may be I'm incorrect, please help me understand.
2. If no, will a dependency relationship suffice from parent to child?

Please share your thoughts/suggestions.

Thanks in advance.

--Sannidhi--
reply
    Bookmark Topic Watch Topic
  • New Topic