Bookmark Topic Watch Topic
  • New Topic
programming forums Java Mobile Certification Databases Caching Books Engineering Micro Controllers OS Languages Paradigms IDEs Build Tools Frameworks Application Servers Open Source This Site Careers Other Pie Elite all forums
this forum made possible by our volunteer staff, including ...
Marshals:
  • Campbell Ritchie
  • Jeanne Boyarsky
  • Ron McLeod
  • Paul Clapham
  • Liutauras Vilda
Sheriffs:
  • paul wheaton
  • Rob Spoor
  • Devaka Cooray
Saloon Keepers:
  • Stephan van Hulst
  • Tim Holloway
  • Carey Brown
  • Frits Walraven
  • Tim Moores
Bartenders:
  • Mikalai Zaikin

Terrible and poor designed framework

 
Greenhorn
Posts: 9
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Report post to moderator
Title:Terrible and poor designed framework

JSF, CMP EJB1.X

please tell me others

Struts 2?
Maybe, But I just don't like too much xml configuration setting even annotation in java code.
Somebody told me webwork2 is good. I believe webwork2 is good but it should use “struts” to cheat people use webwork2
 
Author
Posts: 12617
IntelliJ IDE Ruby
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Report post to moderator
I have no idea what you're asking.

Wading in and throwing around framework insults probably isn't a very productive approach.
 
ariso yang
Greenhorn
Posts: 9
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Report post to moderator
well, any more feedback?
 
David Newton
Author
Posts: 12617
IntelliJ IDE Ruby
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Report post to moderator
Feedback for what? You said JSF and CMP EJB1.X were terrible and poor designed framework (off-topic for this forum) then brought up WebWork, which is now Struts 2 and said you didn't like XML or annotations. There's nothing give feedback about except the off-topic part and the insulting part. If you don't like XML or annotation config then make sure your S2 app can use the convention plugin and skip all the configuration.

What else do you expect?
 
Ranch Hand
Posts: 281
Eclipse IDE Java Windows
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Report post to moderator
some people still have no IDEA, how easy can configuration and XML get...
 
Rancher
Posts: 43081
77
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Report post to moderator
I agree with David - I don't see this topic going anywhere good, so I'm closing it.
 
    Bookmark Topic Watch Topic
  • New Topic