SCJA 1.0, SCJP 1.4, SCWCD 1.4, SCBCD 1.3, SCJP 5.0, SCEA 5, SCBCD 5; OCUP - Fundamental, Intermediate and Advanced; IBM Certified Solution Designer - OOAD, vUML 2; SpringSource Certified Spring Professional
Kengkaj Sathianpantarit wrote:I'm interested but there is no Motorola's vendor in my country. DROID's screen is glass or plastic?
David O'Meara wrote:I have plans on gettig an android phone of some description, but no actual timeline or specifics.
SCJP 1.4, SCWCD 1.4 - Hints for you, Certified Scrum Master
Did a rm -R / to find out that I lost my entire Linux installation!
The Moment, Hero, and Droid area all fairly similar in spec. I think the only real difference is that the Hero runs a modified version of Android.
[List of FAQs] | [Android FAQ] | [Samuh Varta]
Steve
[List of FAQs] | [Android FAQ] | [Samuh Varta]
Steve
It's apparently not common knowledge that there are actually two Droids: the Motorola Droid and the HTC Droid Eris. They're both Android-based phones, but significantly different in form and firmware.
Eris
[List of FAQs] | [Android FAQ] | [Samuh Varta]
Monu Tripathi wrote:Mobile phones got to have fancy names, IMO it plays on the mind too albeit to a lesser extent.
Pat Farrell wrote:
Its interesting that Verizon has two different "Droid" models, and they are pushing the "Droid" branding, not the manufacturer. Additionally, Verizon's ads for the Droid talk about how the biggest problem with the iPhone is the network (unspoken AT&T) with the obvious unspoken idea that if the iPhone was on Verizon's network, it would be a great smartphone.
Verizon is desperate to have consumers think that the network vendor is of prime importance, not the phone itself. Hence the two phones, at separate prices, with the "Droid" name.
The cellphone networks are in a panic that customers will see them as providing big dumb pipes of bits, leading to the service being a commodity.
[List of FAQs] | [Android FAQ] | [Samuh Varta]
[List of FAQs] | [Android FAQ] | [Samuh Varta]