[OCP 17 book] | [OCP 11 book] | [OCA 8 book] [OCP 8 book] [Practice tests book] [Blog] [JavaRanch FAQ] [How To Ask Questions] [Book Promos]
Other Certs: SCEA Part 1, Part 2 & 3, Core Spring 3, TOGAF part 1 and part 2
JSF is called standard because it is in the package under javax.faces.*.*, but not com.sun.*.*. JSF is a component in JEE spec.
Originally posted by James Clark:
I'm not sure "who" calls JSF a standard. I have never heard it referred to as a "standard."
[OCP 17 book] | [OCP 11 book] | [OCA 8 book] [OCP 8 book] [Practice tests book] [Blog] [JavaRanch FAQ] [How To Ask Questions] [Book Promos]
Other Certs: SCEA Part 1, Part 2 & 3, Core Spring 3, TOGAF part 1 and part 2
Also, keep in mind that EJB 1.0 was a "standard." And we all see what happened to that. It was rewritten twice before becoming EJB 3.0.
Originally posted by Bear Bibeault:
Indeed, I've seen quite a bit of the opposite. Some companies I am familiar with, having given JSF a try, are reverting to straight-forward JSP and Servlets. My new job, in fact, is to do just that. The existing Web UI is universally loathed (both usability and technology-wise) and it will be completely replaced with something much more usable and implemented using simpler frameworks (though not Struts).
Originally posted by arulk pillai:
What is RIC? Is it RIA (Rich Internet Application)
Consider Paul's rocket mass heater. |