• Post Reply Bookmark Topic Watch Topic
  • New Topic
programming forums Java Mobile Certification Databases Caching Books Engineering Micro Controllers OS Languages Paradigms IDEs Build Tools Frameworks Application Servers Open Source This Site Careers Other Pie Elite all forums
this forum made possible by our volunteer staff, including ...
Marshals:
  • Campbell Ritchie
  • Jeanne Boyarsky
  • Ron McLeod
  • Paul Clapham
  • Liutauras Vilda
Sheriffs:
  • paul wheaton
  • Rob Spoor
  • Devaka Cooray
Saloon Keepers:
  • Stephan van Hulst
  • Tim Holloway
  • Carey Brown
  • Frits Walraven
  • Tim Moores
Bartenders:
  • Mikalai Zaikin

IS-A question from examlab mock test (Diagnostic Exam)

 
Ranch Hand
Posts: 472
10
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator

An interface "is-a" java.lang.Object



Answer-I is correct, because any object, which has an interface-reference, can be implicitly casted to a java.lang.Object reference, without doing any explicit cast.


Is this statement right?
i didn`t get it. I think that interface is not class and so not is-a Object.
 
Rancher
Posts: 1093
29
Netbeans IDE Oracle MySQL Database Tomcat Server C++ Java
  • Likes 1
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
    Number of slices to send:
    Optional 'thank-you' note:
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
In the most general term: all objects in Java inherit from java.lang.Object, so yes any "object" that has an interface-reference can be cast to java.lang.Object

The child class is always guaranteed to have all references needed to be referenced by the parent class.
 
You are HERE! The other map is obviously wrong. Better confirm with this tiny ad:
a bit of art, as a gift, that will fit in a stocking
https://gardener-gift.com
reply
    Bookmark Topic Watch Topic
  • New Topic