Hello,
A project began like
the Blueprint for the ConceptBase, which have
Neugenery in the core, the fact is we're not in the JCBC
(Java ConceptBase Connectivity) section yet, and question is, would the forum expect JCBC remain like the same policy as JDBC or not?
In addition to that question, I should admit that
the JCBC have one eye on JDBC, too, that's not to say a special version to be for JDBC, due to the different wayward. i.e. this is 'exactly' to say how
the Zipf Law is under consideration by the end of this project, because the Zipf Law is quite 'word' base, whereas
with the Neugenery's vision is quite 'conceptually'.
Because we're expecting most likely a deterministic query from CB (ConceptBase).
Deterministic according to the relativity in which ConceptBase make, and un-deterministic because for example, it occur that there ain't
not experienced such query.
// This modification made because three reason: 1. Thread subject and 2. Upper-case, and 3. Extra addition
// Beside sorry for this modification 'would' cause this subject to be pushed upper stack, therefore, if there was a facility to inactive this impact then the readers won't encounter much.
thanks