Few things in the Java language (or any computer language, for that matter) generate as many questions, or get misused as often as TIME, which is surprising, because computer time really is very simple; it's us puny humans - or rather, our perception of time - that complicates things.
This page is meant to give you a quick overview of how to deal with displaying times, and hopefully to prevent a few common traps that people fall into.
Lesson 1: Java Time is the same - ALWAYS
Whenever you write:
long currentTime = System.currentTimeMillis();or:
Date currentTime = new Date();
you are storing a numeric value containing the current time according to the machine's internal clock.
And if you do it simultaneously on 50 different machines around the world, it will store the same value (OK, it could be out by a few seconds) even though CLOCKS in each of those countries show a different time.
Because computer time uses a universal start point (called the Epoch): in Java's case, 00:00:00 on the 1st of January, 1970 GMT (and that 'GMT' is very important) - and ALL time values are offsets from this point - either negative or positive - in milliseconds.
Thus, all computer (and Java) times contain an implicit date. Indeed, the basic class for storing times in Java is Date - specifically, java.util.Date (there is also a java.sql.Date class).
Lesson 2: So what's the problem?
Simply put: US.
Even in these days of global communication, we live in our own little world, which includes our own little timezone, and assume that everybody else does the same.
So, when we ask "what's the time?", we're not asking what the actual time is, we're asking: "what time of day is it HERE?".
And that's because clock time has nothing to do with actual time (as you'll soon find out if you ever experience jet-lag); it's a convenience for us diurnal humans so that we can deal with where the sun is: "Oh, the sun is overhead; it must be about noon. Time for lunch."
Moreover, the whole business of regional time zones is quite recent. Before the advent of railways, the local church (or Mosque) was the sole arbiter of "what time it is" - and that was mainly to make sure that everybody got to prayers on time.
Computers have no such parochial issues. To them, time is simply a nice long chain of milliseconds from a fixed point (the 'Epoch' described above) - and it's the same chain for everyone, anywhere in the world.
Furthermore, there are network services that allow computers to know where they are and what time it is (the computer's internal clock is good, but even it needs to be corrected every so often) so that they can display the correct CLOCK time accurately.
Anyone who's taken a laptop across timezones will probably have seen the phenomenon: you turn it on at your destination and it shows the WRONG clock time (usually the time where you came from); connect it to the Internet and, hey presto, within a few seconds it's displaying the correct time again.
Remember: Timezones are a human invention. They have nothing to do with actual time.
Lesson 3: Content and Display
Hopefully, I've now convinced you that, for Java (and outside the laws of relativity), time is the same wherever you are in the world. So if I create a Java time value of 1000 (1000 milliseconds after the Epoch) it will equate to 00:00:01 1/1/1970 GMT.
What it will NOT do is display the same around the world.
And this point doesn't just apply to time. Whenever you write Java classes, you need to be very clear to distinguish what they contain from what they look like .
The following code sets up a fairly typical SimpleDateFormat field:
SimpleDateFormat dateStyle = new SimpleDateFormat("yyyy/MM/dd HH:mm:ss z");
This will display a time in the form: 2012/01/01 13:45:00 WET, where the timezone will depend on where your machine is located.
Now, suppose you set up the time described above as follows:
and display it using the format object above:
Now, you send that SAME CODE to four different machines in London, Paris, New York and Tokyo.
In London it will display
1970/01/01 00:00:01 GMT
in Paris it will display
1970/01/01 01:00:01 WET
in New York it will display
1969/12/31 19:00:01 EST // NOTE THE DIFFERENT DATE!
and in Tokyo it will display
1970/01/01 09:00:01 JST
because even though the content (ie, the time) is the same (1000L), the rules for display are different.
And you know what? You don't have to do a darn thing: SimpleDateFormat does it for you. And that's the main point of this lesson (and, in fact, this page):
You don't need to change Java times in order to have them display properly.
If you do, you are simply undoing (and usually fouling up) all the work that those nice guys at Sun did when they created the SimpleDateFormat class for you.
It's probably worth adding that you can also use the class to display a time for timezones that are different to your own, so:
TimeZone paris = TimeZone.getTimeZone("Europe/Paris");
will display EPlus1 according to Paris time.
Since this page is about time, rather than dates, I won't go into the whole mess of different calendars. Suffice to say they are yet another human invention that confuses our notions of time. As of the writing of this page, there is only one javaDoc:java.util.Calendar offered by the standard Java classes: javaDoc:java.util.GregorianCalendar? - and you should get to know it.
It should also be added that Calendars in Java are concerned with storing and manipulating dates and times, NOT displaying them; and if you look carefully at the API, you'll find that there is nothing in them about display.
However, it's probably worth mentioning Daylight Savings Time - yet another human pitchfork in the nice, tidy, ordered world of computer time.
Simple rule: Don't worry about it.
DST is only a factor when you need to display a WikiPedia:Civil_time, and the classes already mentioned will take care of it; including displaying the correct clock time when DST in in effect.
Otherwise? Deal with time as a value; or, if you prefer, as (Epoch + millisecond-offset).
If you always remember that time in Java is a value - and that it's the same for everyone - you're unlikely to run into trouble. It's when you start "overthinking" things that problems crop up.
The fact is that Java's date/time API is bad (and I say that as someone who loves the language).
The classes, other than Date, are clumsy, difficult to follow (Calendar alone contains 49 different fields and 52 methods; and it's not even a concrete class) and scattered all over the place. This is also reflected in the documentation which, while describing how each class works, doesn't really give you any insight as to how you're supposed to use them.
Joda Time to the rescue. It's an open-source project that was set up by a bunch of chaps with the express purpose of making time easier, and includes all sorts of goodies, including complete working calendars for all the major religions, and the ability to deal with time intervals (the difference between two times) directly.
It has also been around for quite a while, so you don't need to worry that you're plunging into "bleeding edge" technology, and it's very compatible with the existing Java time classes.
Indeed, many of its features were suggested to Sun/Oracle as JSR-310 for inclusion into Java Version 7, but were turned down.
More fool them, I say.
Correct answer: No.
Simple answer: Yes.
For anything that you're likely to be dealing with, you can assume that they are the same. Another term for the same time is "Zulu time", often used by the military - particularly sailors.
Another important thing to know about UTC/GMT/Zulu time is that none of them involves Daylight Savings. EVER.
What about leap seconds?
Simple answer: Don't sweat them.
The fact is that if you know about leap seconds, you're probably past the point where you need this page. Furthermore, they are very rare (only 39 have been added since 1961) and they always occur on June 30th or Dec. 31st. at midnight GMT (again, that 'GMT' is very important).
There is only one situation where you might have to worry about them: if you need an accurate timing for a duration that spans a leap-second; and if that's the case, you should use System.nanoTime() rather than System.currentTimeMillis(). Indeed, you should always use nanoTime() if you want accurate timings.
And if the duration is so long that using nanoTime() is impractical? You're stuffed.
Simply put: there is no way to register leap seconds with System.currentTimeMillis(), because they are removed before you ever get to see the value. Joda Time (see above) does allow you to include leap-seconds, but even it might return a bad value if you're unlucky enough to have a duration that starts or ends ON a leap-second.