Originally posted by ankur rathi: On page 40, they are explaining association and aggregation. They took the same example (company and employee) to explain both the relationship so it confuses readers.
May be. Beside I haven't read the book, thats what I want. To see the difference clearly, the one should use the same example, if possible. I would give extra points for that. To me confusion might occur when examples are totally different, then we can't really see the difference sometime.
subject: same example for association and aggregation