aspose file tools*
The moose likes Linux / UNIX and the fly likes Linux Vs WIN98 On LAN? Big Moose Saloon
  Search | Java FAQ | Recent Topics | Flagged Topics | Hot Topics | Zero Replies
Register / Login
JavaRanch » Java Forums » Engineering » Linux / UNIX
Bookmark "Linux Vs WIN98 On LAN?" Watch "Linux Vs WIN98 On LAN?" New topic
Author

Linux Vs WIN98 On LAN?

Vikrama Sanjeeva
Ranch Hand

Joined: Sep 02, 2001
Posts: 756
Which one is more suitable,best,efficient and easy to use on LAN.And does it possible that Server is using WIN98 and client using Linux.
Bye.
Viki.
SCJP2.


Count the flowers of your garden, NOT the leafs which falls away!
Prepare IBM Exam 340 by joining http://groups.yahoo.com/group/IBM340Exam/
Michael Ernest
High Plains Drifter
Sheriff

Joined: Oct 25, 2000
Posts: 7292

Linux is better. A Win 98 "server" is something like a contradiction in terms, but there are tools out there to help Linux and Windows work together. [http://www/samba.org]Samba[/url] is one of them.


Make visible what, without you, might perhaps never have been seen.
- Robert Bresson
Tim Holloway
Saloon Keeper

Joined: Jun 25, 2001
Posts: 16065
    
  21

If you've GOT to use a Microsoft OS as a server, use an NT platform system, not a 9x one. For one thing, one version of Windows 98 has a known problem where after a certain number of days it will crash even if you never do anything. My copy has all the stability of a paper jumbo jet, and I'm allegedly pretty talented in the care and feeding of OS's.
Overall, it's better to have the server be Linux and the client be Windows. I'm not real happy with the current crop of Linux Desktops.


Customer surveys are for companies who didn't pay proper attention to begin with.
 
I agree. Here's the link: http://aspose.com/file-tools
 
subject: Linux Vs WIN98 On LAN?