Agile Development delivers the work faster but we miss strategic approach for development which turns into not very good product developed which can be achieved using RUP process. Please explain how is this better than RUP.
First, Agile is not a methodology but a set of principle documented in the Agile Manifesto RUP is a methodology for software and system delivery when the principles are documented, but also the roles, activities, and delivery processes (Work Breakdown structure to achieve a specific goal). So while Agile is identifying the theory, RUP gives elements also at the project plan level(WBS)
Second, Agile and RUP principles are very similar in essence. I know this statement is not popular in the Agile community, but it is so true. Take a look at Agile principles, and compare to RUP principles. It fits * Adapt the Process * Balance Competing Stakeholder Priorities * Collaborate Across Teams * Demonstrate Value Iteratively * Elevate Level of Abstraction * Focus Continuously On Quality
/ JeanLouis<br /><i>"software development has been, is, and will remain fundamentally hard" (Grady Booch)</i><br /> <br />Take a look at <a href="http://www.epfwiki.net/wikis/openup/" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">Agile OpenUP</a> in the Eclipse community
Originally posted by rafi qureshi: Agile Development delivers the work faster but we miss strategic approach for development which turns into not very good product developed which can be achieved using RUP process. Please explain how is this better than RUP.
Where does your impression that Agile projects miss a strategic approach come from? That's not at all my experience...
The soul is dyed the color of its thoughts. Think only on those things that are in line with your principles and can bear the light of day. The content of your character is your choice. Day by day, what you do is who you become. Your integrity is your destiny - it is the light that guides your way. - Heraclitus