wood burning stoves
The moose likes Agile and Other Processes and the fly likes Agile QA Vs Regular QA Big Moose Saloon
  Search | Java FAQ | Recent Topics | Flagged Topics | Hot Topics | Zero Replies
Register / Login
JavaRanch » Java Forums » Engineering » Agile and Other Processes
Bookmark "Agile QA Vs Regular QA" Watch "Agile QA Vs Regular QA" New topic

Agile QA Vs Regular QA

Vinayagam Kulandaivel
Ranch Hand

Joined: Nov 26, 2004
Posts: 43

Agile QA - The more active QA

Regular QA - Comparatively less with agile QA

any thoughts?

Thanks & Regards
James Shore
Ranch Hand

Joined: Sep 21, 2007
Posts: 46
Hi Vinayagam,

The opposite is actually true, in my experience. Many shops use manual regression testing, which is incredibly slow and expensive. Ratios of 1 tester to 2 developers, or even 1:1 or greater are common.

XP, in contrast, has automated regression tests that are created by the programmers. The regression testing burden is much smaller, which reduces the number of testers you need and also frees the testers up to contribute in more sophisticated ways. I've ratios of 1:4, 1:6, and lower.

See my post about how testers fit in and my post about staffing ratios for more.

James Shore, coauthor of <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Art-Agile-Development-James-Shore/dp/0596527675" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">The Art of Agile Development</a>. Website and blog at <a href="http://www.jamesshore.com" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">http://www.jamesshore.com</A> .
Vinayagam Kulandaivel
Ranch Hand

Joined: Nov 26, 2004
Posts: 43
Hi Jim,

Thanks for the reference.

I agree. Here's the link: http://aspose.com/file-tools
subject: Agile QA Vs Regular QA
It's not a secret anymore!