Hey everyone,
Here are some stats from Pauls site at
http://www.jdiscuss.com/index.jsp?tab=scjp&option=VAR --The average person that takes the JQ+ tests scored 4.62 points more on the actual
test.
--The average person that takes Marcus Green's tests scored 5.25 points less on the actual test.
--The average person that trys the rules roundup here at the ranch scored 13.1 points less on the actual test.
So the rules round up and Marcus's tests look to be easier than the actual test, while JQ+ looks to be harder. But the JQ+ scores seem to be much closer to the actual scores received. Could be because the JQ+ test more closely matches the real one? I dont know I haven't got JQ+ yet. (I'm in my final 6 weeks of study for the test so you'll get my order in a week or two Paul.)
Keep in mind too, that the format for all of these is very different and that there are, so far, very few results to base these on. The more scores reported the better the generalizations that can be made.
So the more people that report their scores the better the people that are studying can judge their own preparedness.
hope that helps someone
Dave
[This message has been edited by Dave Vick (edited June 11, 2001).]