Dear all, I need to thank you all (Andrew, Phil, Jim, Deep, Vlad, Mark, Bharat, Dushy......) very much for all the kindly help and detail&clear discussion in every detail. Without this forum, I can't make it. The following is the my score. It is not good, but I really don't have time to make it better. The maximum possible score is 400; the minimum to pass is 320. General Considerations (maximum = 100): 92 Documentation (maximum = 70): 69 O-O Design (maximum = 30): 30 GUI (maximum = 40): 28 Locking (maximum = 80): 44 Data store (maximum = 40): 40 Network server (maximum = 40): 40 Hi Andrew, Phil, and all the others who paid attention to the 2/3 tier design issue, now I believe that SUN does like the 2-tier/thin client design for the URLyBird assignment. I am wondering is there any way to find out why they think there is a problem with the locking at server side? Again, thanks you all! Good luck, Joe
SCJP, SCJD, SCWCD, SCEA I.
Akash Singh
Ranch Hand
Joined: Aug 21, 2003
Posts: 80
posted
0
Congratulations Joe.
Philippe Maquet
Bartender
Joined: Jun 02, 2003
Posts: 1872
posted
0
Hi Joe, Congratulations, great job !
now I believe that SUN does like the 2-tier/thin client design
Mmh... looks like you just invented the third way of doing ! Best, Phil.
Joe J. Wang
Ranch Hand
Joined: Feb 26, 2003
Posts: 67
posted
0
Thanks guys! Hi Phil,
quote: -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- now I believe that SUN does like the 2-tier/thin client design -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Mmh... looks like you just invented the third way of doing !
Yes, this new one will bring us a perfect score. Best, Joe
Vlad Rabkin
Ranch Hand
Joined: Jul 07, 2003
Posts: 555
posted
0
Hi Joe, Congratulations! Best Wishes, Vlad
Andrew Monkhouse
author and jackaroo
Marshal Commander
0
