File APIs for Java Developers
Manipulate DOC, XLS, PPT, PDF and many others from your application.
The moose likes Certification Results and the fly likes Barely squeaked by SCJP 1.4 with 88%. Big Moose Saloon
  Search | Java FAQ | Recent Topics | Flagged Topics | Hot Topics | Zero Replies
Register / Login
JavaRanch » Java Forums » Certification » Certification Results
Bookmark "Barely squeaked by SCJP 1.4 with 88%." Watch "Barely squeaked by SCJP 1.4 with 88%." New topic

Barely squeaked by SCJP 1.4 with 88%.

Dave Alkire

Joined: Jun 25, 2004
Posts: 10
Actually of course I'm quite happy about it, though I do envy the brainy types on this forum who nailed the thing completely. And I didn't really expect to do any better, but I decided a very long time ago indeed --four years, now-- that I wanted a Java certification.
I did much of Deitel & Deitel�s �Java 2 How to Program� back then- particularly enjoyed their array-manipulation and recursion exercises, like the palindrome tester, the towers of Hanoi puzzle, and the random maze generator.. But then many months passed without any Java for me.. Then about 1 � years ago I read through Head First Java, Sierra & Bates � you guys are hilarious! Then after another 6 months I picked up S & B�s Sun Certified Programmer & Developer.. Read through it, did all the exercises (there are only like ten of them, compared with almost 200 in Deitel & Deitel.. Not that I�m saying that�s a bad thing, mind you..) and did all of the end-of-chapter self tests. For wrong answers I read the explanations and thought I understood.
Then I took a few practice exam sessions from the book�s CD, just five or ten questions at a time, to see how I�d fair.. Not well. I consistently got at least half of them wrong. Discouraged, I gave Java a rest for a few more months.
Then I picked the book up again in January and really gave it a go this time. Every time I saw a snippet of code anywhere in that book, even if it was just an aside, I typed it into some class and made it run or break or do whatever it was trying to demonstrate. This time with the self-test questions, sort-of understanding the mistakes wasn�t enough; I had to code it out. I followed this idea for the free practice exams that you get with the book, and bought the Sun practice tests, proceeding the same way..

So anyway now you see why I say I barely squeaked by with 88%. Whew!

-Dave A.
chowdary Thammineedi
Ranch Hand

Joined: Aug 16, 2004
Posts: 126
COngratulations or are they BARELY?

Dave Alkire

Joined: Jun 25, 2004
Posts: 10
Thanks Chowdary, actually I am grateful and relieved that I got by as well as I did; I hope my post did not truly convey any sort of, well, whatever it is that inspires angry faces, and I hope you were just trying to be funny..
But nevertheless, I should ask you: how long ago did you start working toward the exam? I bet it was sometime more recent than spring 2001. Those guys who aced it 100%? I think one of them mentioned that he studied for maybe two months. I have family members, grad-student types, who consistently get 98-100% on all manner of difficult tests, some of them, I dare say, even more difficult than the SCJP. Considering how long and hard I�ve been at it, well, lets just say my desire for a centum score far exceeded my more realistic expectation, which was maybe 80, or well really I had no idea as my practice test results were all over the place.

Oh I should mention, on the GC section, whenever I saw a question like �when is object on line 13 eligible for garbage collection�, I drew little diagrams like the ones found in S&B�s Head First Java � you know the ones with reference variables that look like little remote controls and objects like balloons? I think that�s why I scored centum on that part.
My weakest section was in Flow Control, Assertions and Exception Handling, at 66%.. I was disappointed because thought I had that stuff down pat.
Tong Chen
Ranch Hand

Joined: Apr 26, 2002
Posts: 1011

I agree. Here's the link:
subject: Barely squeaked by SCJP 1.4 with 88%.
jQuery in Action, 3rd edition