aspose file tools*
The moose likes Mock Exam Errata and the fly likes Valentin's Question 52 Big Moose Saloon
  Search | Java FAQ | Recent Topics | Flagged Topics | Hot Topics | Zero Replies
Register / Login


Win a copy of Spring in Action this week in the Spring forum!
JavaRanch » Java Forums » Certification » Mock Exam Errata
Bookmark "Valentin Watch "Valentin New topic
Author

Valentin's Question 52

Mike Gershman
Ranch Hand

Joined: Mar 13, 2004
Posts: 1272
While I agree with the results, I don't agree with the explanation of question 52.

This scenario doesn't happen:
Imagine the following scenario: t1 starts, it invokes aMethod. i is now 1. t1 releases the lock associated with a and the scheduler decides that it is the turn of t2 to run. t2 invokes aMethod and i's value is now 2.


The code actually creates two Question52 objects, each with its own A object.

The instance methods aMethod() and bMethod() synchronize on the current instance of A. Since ++ and -- are not thread-safe, threads t1 and t2 could easily corrupt static variable i during their combined 20,000,000 executions.


Mike Gershman
SCJP 1.4, SCWCD in process
 
I agree. Here's the link: http://aspose.com/file-tools
 
subject: Valentin's Question 52