The moose likes Web Services Certification (SCDJWS/OCEJWSD) and the fly likes From MZ's Guide - Clarifications Reqd Big Moose Saloon
  Search | Java FAQ | Recent Topics | Flagged Topics | Hot Topics | Zero Replies
Register / Login

Win a copy of Murach's Java Servlets and JSP this week in the Servlets forum!
JavaRanch » Java Forums » Certification » Web Services Certification (SCDJWS/OCEJWSD)
Bookmark "From MZ Watch "From MZ New topic

From MZ's Guide - Clarifications Reqd

Rahul Mishra
Ranch Hand

Joined: Jan 22, 2006
Posts: 211
I came across the following in MZ'z notes

1)A document-literal binding in a DESCRIPTION MUST, in each of its soapbind:body element(s), have at most one part listed in the parts
attribute, if the parts attribute is specified.

2)If a document-literal binding in a DESCRIPTION does not specify the parts attribute on a soapbind:body element, the corresponding
abstract wsdl:message MUST define zero or one wsdl arts.

I have not seen in RMH - body being used with parts, could MZ/someone provide an example or reference links on the same?

My SCEA experience:http://javalogue.blogspot.com/
Praveen Babu
Ranch Hand

Joined: Jul 30, 2006
Posts: 138
See Sections 3.1 and 3.5 in the following link

I agree. Here's the link: http://aspose.com/file-tools
subject: From MZ's Guide - Clarifications Reqd
Similar Threads
WSDL schema verification
Clarification sought on the Basic profile
Document/literal messaging
SOAP - restriction to only one message part when using the type attribute
Doubt in Basic Profile 1.1