JAVA IS NOT A 100% OBJECT ORIENETD LANGUAGE.I DO NOT KNOW THE EXACT REASON.SOMEBODY OPINES B'COZ IT DOES NOT SUPPORT MULTIPLE INHERITANCE, BUT IT IS NOT ENTIRELY TRUE AS C++ IS ALSO NOT 100% OBJECT ORIENTED WHEREAS IT SUPPORTS THE SAME.KINDLY REPLY THE ANSWER.I WILL BE ERY THANKFUL TO ALL WHO WILL SHARE HIS KNOWLEDGE WITH ME.THANKING YOU ALL. WITH REGARDS. SUMIT (SUMEETOOPS@REDIFFMAIL.COM)[/LIST][/LIST]
Chris Mathews
Ranch Hand
Joined: Jul 18, 2001
Posts: 2712
posted
0
Please take off cap locks. Most people say that Java is not fully object-oriented because of its dichotomy between objects and primitives. The often used example of a fully OO language is Smalltalk or Eiffel. See this similar thread we had a few months ago in the OO, Patterns, UML and Refactoring Forum: Java and OOPS.