Is it necessary to have a class defined in the Class diagram to use its instance in the sequence diagram? I believe that some tools enforce this but I don't believe that this is an UML constraint. In my opinion, Class diagrams have to give the developer a good idea about the entities and the relationships between them. Showing all the specialized classes such as the DAOs, helpers,etc, would only clutter the class diagram and it would be a good idea to show them in the sequence diagram. Any comments on this? Also, can anyone confirm if this constraint is not UML based but a tool-specific one? thanks in advance! Sridhar
welcome to forum...Nopes..its not a UML constraint..For seq diag, they just say u to put a colon( in front.. in case u want to show classes in seq diag. If u havent put any colon, assumption is that it is an object..corresponding class may or may not be shown in class diag... I agree with ur second point.
SCEA-I, BCJP<p>IBM (India)
Joined: Nov 30, 2001
Thanks, Nishant. I suppose that a smiley would work just as well in the place of the colon : - )
I’ve looked at a lot of different solutions, and in my humble opinion Aspose is the way to go. Here’s the link: http://aspose.com
subject: Class diagram and Sequence Diagram -- Connection