This week's giveaway is in the Android forum.
We're giving away four copies of Android Security Essentials Live Lessons and have Godfrey Nolan on-line!
See this thread for details.
The moose likes Architect Certification (SCEA/OCMJEA) and the fly likes granularity of component diagrams Big Moose Saloon
  Search | Java FAQ | Recent Topics | Flagged Topics | Hot Topics | Zero Replies
Register / Login


Win a copy of Android Security Essentials Live Lessons this week in the Android forum!
JavaRanch » Java Forums » Certification » Architect Certification (SCEA/OCMJEA)
Bookmark "granularity of component diagrams" Watch "granularity of component diagrams" New topic
Author

granularity of component diagrams

D. Rose
Ranch Hand

Joined: Apr 25, 2003
Posts: 215
Hi,

How much granular component diagram be?
Component is supposed to be separate dployable physical component.
So can I group all my EJB's in single component or each EJB would un itself be separate component?
H. Hafer
Ranch Hand

Joined: Aug 23, 2004
Posts: 108
I packaged the EJB's according to some rules and showed only the package in the component diagram. The package itself exposed the contained EJB's as a list of names.

Cheers,
Harbo
D. Rose
Ranch Hand

Joined: Apr 25, 2003
Posts: 215
Is package valid in component diagrams as per UML standards? Don't we have separate package diagrams?
Or do you mean you showed one big component with list of all EJBs?

I think it should be valid if I show each EJB as separate component. Though practically we deploy all of them together, theoretically each can be deployed as separate physical unit. Also if I show them as separate components, I can show their interdependency clearly ( which is not so clear on sequence diagrams)
 
With a little knowledge, a cast iron skillet is non-stick and lasts a lifetime.
 
subject: granularity of component diagrams
 
Similar Threads
WA #1.....word association
using JPanel for everything
How to design when domain is well understood?
DoubleBuffering when there are buttons
how to show component in single row