| Author |
jsp in sequence diagram
|
Parag Doshi
Ranch Hand
Joined: Jun 29, 2004
Posts: 317
|
|
In Cade's book, the JSP's are named as BrowseCatalogJSP,ProductPageJSP etc and in core J2EE patterns, I had seen jsp pages shown with <<jsp>> stereotype. Which is the better alternative or does it even matter if we choose either of the 2 conventions?
Parag
|
 |
H. Hafer
Ranch Hand
Joined: Aug 23, 2004
Posts: 108
|
|
Parag,
I named the JSPs fooForm and barForm to underline their functional character (as being forms) and stereotyped them <<JSP>> to underline their technical character (as being JSP pages).
HTH,
Harbo
|
|
Ramon Gill
Ranch Hand
Joined: May 15, 2003
Posts: 344
|
|
Parag,
It doesn't really matter which convention you choose, sa long as you make you diagrams easy to understand. However, I do like the sterotype of << JSP >> , as this clearly shows what type of page is being used.
Ray
|
|
D. Rose
Ranch Hand
Joined: Apr 25, 2003
Posts: 215
|
|
I also like <<jsp>> stereotype for better clarity
If we decide to change the view component, I can still use it, just change stereotype!
|
|
 |
|
|
subject: jsp in sequence diagram
|
|
|
0
