• Post Reply
  • Bookmark Topic Watch Topic
  • New Topic

FFMS & TMS

 
Andrea Gazzarini
Ranch Hand
Posts: 125
  • 0
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
Hi! I have a questions...how do I can represents the FFMS and TMS on my component diagram?
The FFMS is a subsystem and I can represent it with a stereotyped package, but what about an external system (like TransMaster)?

Thanks in advance...
 
Giri Alwar
Ranch Hand
Posts: 37
  • 0
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
I would represent them both the same way (as subsystems). This is how Cade-Roberts represent external systems in the example in their book.
 
Andrea Gazzarini
Ranch Hand
Posts: 125
  • 0
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
HI!I think the component diagram in the Cade's book is not full UML compliant.
What does it means the interface depends on the subsystems (IContentManagement ---> ContentManagement)? In together I can't draw a dependency between an interface and a <<subsystem> package.
If I must indicate that a subsystem supports an interface, I must draw it as a component and now I can drag a line (supports) between the subsystem and interface (the dependency direction is subsystem --> interface).
My question is : The diagrams on the Cade's book are designed with Together...how is possible?
 
Mark Cave
Ranch Hand
Posts: 92
  • 0
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
I would represent them both the same way (as subsystems). This is how Cade-Roberts represent external systems in the example in their book.

But still we need a component to interface with each of the systems. For these two components I am planning to give a paragraph that discuss their possible implementation, and how they are going to interface with FFMS and TMS.
What do you think guys?
 
I agree. Here's the link: http://aspose.com/file-tools
  • Post Reply
  • Bookmark Topic Watch Topic
  • New Topic