Cleared Part II and III with 83%

Hi All,

least to say, am very happy today.. Got my results.

class diag : 44/44
comp diag : 34/44
seq : 5/12

total 83%

Thanks to ranchers!! It took me close to 2 months of effort , but the real one was lasted only last 2-3 weeks. I wrote my part III on 4th Oct and got my result today, so close to 6 weeks.

thanks,

Congratulations Bharat.

Can you please tell us what books and resources you have referred for part II and Part III. Have you specified attributes and methods in class diagram?

How many class diagrams you have provided totally?

And anything relevant, pls inform.
Thanks.
Laxmi

Can you take about your component diagram?

what solution did you use to integrate the mileage system?

Congrats, good job!

Regards,

Congrats !!!

Congratulations Bharat.

Can you please tell us what books and resources you have referred for part II and Part III. Have you specified attributes and methods in class diagram?

How many class diagrams you have provided totally?

And anything relevant, pls inform.
Thanks.
Laxmi

REPLY : Java ranch is the answer to what i referred. Apart from this, I tired to follow Mark cade, though not exactly. I kept it technology independent.
I showed some composition relationships. I had about 22 classes. I kept the same cardinalitites as in the assignment and did not change as done some some fellow ranchers.

I did specify some attrubutes to make my class more understandable. But nothing more then this.

I followed what cade did like Search Processor classes, but I did not tag it as any time of EJB.

Can you take about your component diagram?

REPLY: I had 5 component diagrams. I gave component diagram for those use cases/ systems that I felt were complex and needed more detailed level of description.

I had the following:

1 overall compone t diagram ( no JSP)
Rest 4 component diagrams with JSP/ Servlets and other J2EE components.

I hope this helps.

Can you take about your component diagram?

The approach I took was simple. I assumed that the Mileage system exposes a CGI interface to it's front end which uses it to get the data it needs. I am going to use the same interface.

I assumed that the CGI interface is written in Java. So i call this CGI java interface directly from EJB and get the data I need.

I also assume that The system is updates by another way and not thru this interface.

Remember, nothing is wrong ot right here. Whatever u do, justify that.

Congratulations,

Great score ...

Thanks your answer
More questions
Did your change the BDM segment--flight?
Did you use DAO factory ,I think this make things complex.

Thanks your answer
More questions
Did your change the BDM segment--flight?

No I did not change anything. I kept the cardinality as it was.

Did you use DAO factory ,I think this make things complex.
Keep it simple is all I can say. rest is up to you.
These things can come at the later stage. They are most interested in seeing how you deal with the bigger issue.

The segment is the part of customer's itinerary how can a flight just for a customer segment for some manager customer can take one same flight.Can this association is 1 to 1?

The segment is the part of customer's itinerary how can a flight just for a customer segment for some manager customer can take one same flight.Can this association is 1 to 1?
--------------------

I COULD NOT UNDERSTAND YOUR QUESTION..

multiple customers may both have the segments that order the same flight.So the association between the segment and flight is 1 to1

I look the segment as a reservation of a flight.If not we must introduce the new object to store the flight ans seat reserved info,so segment object is no use.