I have decided to use EJB 2.0. I will use CMP/CMR for persistence. My question is: since the container handles the persistance of dependent CMP entity beans, should the container's intervention be shown in the sequence diagram? or just the method calls at the application level (not the container level)?
Container intervention is vendor dependent. In general tt's not wise to show the vendor dependent information in UML.
Joined: Feb 23, 2006
Thanks, Sreenivasa. I was also wondering if CMP/CMR is used, would each of the following be implemented as an entity bean: itinerary, segment, flight, equipment, and seats? This may slow down the EJB container too much. What do you think?
I’ve looked at a lot of different solutions, and in my humble opinion Aspose is the way to go. Here’s the link: http://aspose.com