Win a copy of Clojure in Action this week in the Clojure forum!
  • Post Reply
  • Bookmark Topic Watch Topic
  • New Topic

Passed SCEA [95%]

 
Andy Malakov
Greenhorn
Posts: 26
  • 0
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
Hello All,

Got my score today (after almost 6 weeks of waiting)


Class Diagram (44 maximum) .......................... 41
Component Diagram (44 maximum) ...................... 42 Sequence/CollAboration Diagrams (12 maximum) ........ 12


All these "Passed scea" topics helped my motivation :-)

Thanks everybody.

Best Regards,
Andy
SCEA
 
Sal Paul
Greenhorn
Posts: 4
  • 0
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
Congrats..

Paul
SCEA
 
ManojKumar Unnikrishnan
Ranch Hand
Posts: 32
  • 0
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
Congrats !!! Thats a wonderful score you have got.
Can you please let us know as to what approach did you follow for designing the classes and sequence diagrams.
 
Kayman
Ranch Hand
Posts: 40
  • 0
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
Congratulations
 
Lars Behnke
Ranch Hand
Posts: 76
  • 0
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
Congratulations, Andy.
 
karthikeyan Chockalingam
Ranch Hand
Posts: 259
  • 0
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
Congratulations
 
Karan Shah
Ranch Hand
Posts: 35
  • 0
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
Congrats!!! awesome result!!!

Could please give us some valuable tips on class diagram and component Diagram?
 
Andy Malakov
Greenhorn
Posts: 26
  • 0
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
Thanks everybody.

My biggest problem was figuring out level of details. At some point I even had to change my design and make payment processing synchronous to avoid extensive documentation :-)

For example, I only mentioned that all appropriate components should use well-known ServiceLocator/BusinessDelegate patterns and omitted all this stuff from diagrams.
 
ManojKumar Unnikrishnan
Ranch Hand
Posts: 32
  • 0
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
So dont you have to show the implementation of the patterns in the class diagrams ??
 
Andy Malakov
Greenhorn
Posts: 26
  • 0
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
Originally posted by ManojKumar Unnikrishnan:
So dont you have to show the implementation of the patterns in the class diagrams ??

Correct. Class diagram may only show data model classes. My point is that sequence diagrams may also omit ServiceLocator or BusinessDelegate.
 
Andy Fisher
Greenhorn
Posts: 20
  • 0
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
What about the component diagram, did you indicate your Service Locators, etc. there?

...or did you just state in your assumptions that you were going to be using them?
 
Scott Guo
Greenhorn
Posts: 23
  • 0
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
Hi Andy,

Congrats! That's an ideal and satisfiable exam result...

As you know, we should apply the class diagram in different levels, they are analysis and design level. Do you think we should apply the sequence diagrams for both class level and component level?

BTW, how long did you complete your Part II exam project and diagrams? It's one month or two months.

I'm looking forward to your reply! Thanks a lot!

Yours sincerely,

Scott
 
Andy Malakov
Greenhorn
Posts: 26
  • 0
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
Originally posted by Scott Guo:
Do you think we should apply the sequence diagrams for both class level and component level?

To make my sequence diagrams readable, I made them simple and small. I limited their width to fit an average computer screen and used SD-frames a few times. Most of participants were components. The largest sequence diagram had 8 participants.
 
Andy Malakov
Greenhorn
Posts: 26
  • 0
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
Originally posted by Andy Fisher:
What about the component diagram, did you indicate your Service Locators, etc. there?

...or did you just state in your assumptions that you were going to be using them?


Yes. That was the only place I showed them. But again, in contrast to Cade book, I showed all JSP pages as one component - "JSPs".
 
Jibu Thomas
Greenhorn
Posts: 12
  • 0
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
Congratulations. Good achievement.What type of relationship you showed in Component Diagram? Only dependency?or association, generalization, realization etc as in class diagram?

Jibu
 
Scott Guo
Greenhorn
Posts: 23
  • 0
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
Thanks Andy! I will pay more care on components participant in sequence diagram.

BTW, because I'm still studying the Ripple methodology, and prepare to join the SCEA part II exam, so is it to convenient to ask you how long did you spend for completing the PART II exam?

Thank you!

Scott
 
Scott Guo
Greenhorn
Posts: 23
  • 0
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
Have to disturb you again. Could you give the total number of documents and UML types for Part II exam? Thanks a lot!
 
Andy Malakov
Greenhorn
Posts: 26
  • 0
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
Originally posted by Jibu Thomas:
Congratulations. Good achievement.What type of relationship you showed in Component Diagram? Only dependency?or association, generalization, realization etc as in class diagram?

Jibu


Component diagram showed only dependency. Showing other relationships would have resulted in much more detailed diagram.
 
  • Post Reply
  • Bookmark Topic Watch Topic
  • New Topic