Granny's Programming Pearls
"inside of every large program is a small program struggling to get out"
JavaRanch.com/granny.jsp
  • Post Reply
  • Bookmark Topic Watch Topic
  • New Topic

Passed SCEA Part II / III with 81%

 
Muhammad Asif
Ranch Hand
Posts: 202
  • 0
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
Hi All,

Alhamdullilah, I have passed part II and III. It took me less than a month, where i spent better part of my weekends. Probably, around 40 Man hours of effort has gone into the assignment.

I don't know why I lost so many marks in class diagrams, when I thought it was near perfect.

This report shows the total points that could have been awarded in each section and the actual amount of points you were awarded. This information is provided in order to give you feedback on your relative strengths on a section basis.
The maximum number of points you could have received is 100, minimum to pass is 70.

Class Diagram (44 maximum) .......................... 32
Component Diagram (44 maximum) ...................... 40 Sequence/Collaboration Diagrams (12 maximum) ........ 9

I would like to convey my heartfelt thanks to this forum which has been an essential part of my preparation during the time.

Regards,
 
Deepak Bala
Bartender
Posts: 6663
5
Firefox Browser Linux MyEclipse IDE
  • 0
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
Congratulations ! Can you give details about your class diagram, component diagrams and sequence diagrams ?
 
ravindra janapreddy
Ranch Hand
Posts: 84
  • 0
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
Congratulations Asif!
 
Parvathi Gontina
Greenhorn
Posts: 14
  • 0
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
Hey..Congrats !!!

Can you please share your efforts/experiences for Part-1/2/3.

Cheers,
Parvathi.
 
sanjay sahu
Ranch Hand
Posts: 89
  • 0
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
Congrats Asif !

Time to celebrate.

Could you share some info about your class diagrams. Did you follow the Pet Store blue print approach or Mark Cade approach ?
[ May 28, 2007: Message edited by: sanjay sahu ]
 
Nik Arora
Ranch Hand
Posts: 652
  • 0
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
Congrats





Regards
Nik
Scjp 1.5
 
Muhammad Asif
Ranch Hand
Posts: 202
  • 0
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
Thanks a lot for the wishes...

The question regarding Class Diagram and Component Diagram is quite interesting.. Infact, i was really worried about my component diagram, however was extremely sure about the correctness of my class diagram. Class diagram was split for EJB's, Value Objects, Utilities etc.

There were two component diagrams, one was general about the overall framework, and the other one showed the components in detail.

Regards,
 
Tiago Fernandez
Ranch Hand
Posts: 167
  • 0
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
Originally posted by Muhammad Asif:
The question regarding Class Diagram and Component Diagram is quite interesting.. Infact, i was really worried about my component diagram, however was extremely sure about the correctness of my class diagram. Class diagram was split for EJB's, Value Objects, Utilities etc.


What about extending the business domain model by creating another class diagram? Have you did it?
 
Marc Peabody
pie sneak
Sheriff
Posts: 4727
Mac Ruby VI Editor
  • 0
  • Mark post as helpful
  • send pies
  • Quote
  • Report post to moderator
Originally posted by Muhammad Asif:
The question regarding Class Diagram and Component Diagram is quite interesting.. Infact, i was really worried about my component diagram, however was extremely sure about the correctness of my class diagram. Class diagram was split for EJB's, Value Objects, Utilities etc.


Sun's scoring criteria says:
1) Class Diagram: This category covers how well your class diagram(s) address the object model needed to satisfy the requirements.

I imagine they are looking for just an extension of the Domain Model. I assume it would be best to keep the class diagram technology neutral.
  • Post Reply
  • Bookmark Topic Watch Topic
  • New Topic