aspose file troubles
The moose likes Product and Other Certifications and the fly likes My thoughts on the exam The Big Moose Saloon
  Search | Java FAQ | Recent Topics
Register / Login


JavaRanch » Java Forums » Professional Certification » Product and Other Certifications
Reply Bookmark "My thoughts on the exam" Watch "My thoughts on the exam" New topic
Author

My thoughts on the exam

Drew Lane
Ranch Hand

Joined: May 13, 2001
Posts: 294
I took the exam a couple of days ago. It was reasonably difficult but certainly not impossible with the right amount of studying.
I had a lot of questions on SMS and WMA. Almost to the point I thought it was getting ridiculous as I don't see this API as a core technology.
I don't think anyone should be upset because the exam got extended. I look at it as a learning experience. Just try your best. You can always retake it if you really think it's going to boost your salary by 50%.
The thing that bugs me most about this exam is that it doesn't cover any CDC or Personal Profile. I think Sun is missing the boat by putting all it's eggs in the MIDP basket. IMO, the exam needs to be redesigned to cover CDC and all the other profiles (I would skip the optional APIs). Otherwise, they should call it "Sun Certified MIDP Application Developer".
Drew
D V
Greenhorn

Joined: Jul 11, 2003
Posts: 12
CDC has entire j2se JVM implemented i guess. Its not KVM.
and the profiles on top of CDC are meant for non-UI electronic devices such as SetTop boxes, Car navigation systems and stuff.
MIDP is for smart phones and 2 way pagers.
Even PDAs have different profile PDAprofile, which i guess industry has no supported implementation.
So, i think SCMAD justifies its name.
Ko Ko Naing
Ranch Hand

Joined: Jun 08, 2002
Posts: 3178
Originally posted by Drew Lane:
Otherwise, they should call it "Sun Certified MIDP Application Developer".

Shouldn't they call it "Sun Certified MIDP, CLDC, WMA and MMAPI Application Developer", because they are not overlapping each other?
I think the name SCMAD itself is cool enough for me...

Co-author of SCMAD Exam Guide, Author of JMADPlus
SCJP1.2, CCNA, SCWCD1.4, SCBCD1.3, SCMAD1.0, SCJA1.0, SCJP6.0
Avinash Mangipudi
Greenhorn

Joined: Jan 01, 2004
Posts: 26
We may be "Sun Certified MAD" people
Sunar Susanto
Greenhorn

Joined: Feb 23, 2004
Posts: 8
Isn't it the long title should be:
Sun Certified Mobile Application Developer for the J2ME Platform 1.4 ?
or maybe:
Sun Certified Developer for the J2ME Platform 1.4

Sunar Susanto<p>SCJP 1.4<br />OCA DBA 9i<br />CCNA (640-801)<br />SCMAD<br />---------------
Mike Wang
Ranch Hand

Joined: May 09, 2003
Posts: 76
I have a name for it.
Sun certified JTWI developer
short: SCJTWID
this exam is based on JTWI road map 1

Originally posted by Drew Lane:
I took the exam a couple of days ago. It was reasonably difficult but certainly not impossible with the right amount of studying.
I had a lot of questions on SMS and WMA. Almost to the point I thought it was getting ridiculous as I don't see this API as a core technology.
I don't think anyone should be upset because the exam got extended. I look at it as a learning experience. Just try your best. You can always retake it if you really think it's going to boost your salary by 50%.
The thing that bugs me most about this exam is that it doesn't cover any CDC or Personal Profile. I think Sun is missing the boat by putting all it's eggs in the MIDP basket. IMO, the exam needs to be redesigned to cover CDC and all the other profiles (I would skip the optional APIs). Otherwise, they should call it "Sun Certified MIDP Application Developer".
Drew

SCJP1.4<br />SCWCD 1.4 (Beta)<br />SCMAD 1.0 (Beta)<br />SCDJWS (Beta)<br />SCBCD 1.3 <br />SCJD <br />SCEA (Prepairing)<br />"I am mike, not milk"
 
aspose file troubles
 
subject: My thoughts on the exam
 
aspose file troubles