wood burning stoves 2.0*
The moose likes EJB Certification (SCBCD/OCPJBCD) and the fly likes CMP relationship fields Big Moose Saloon
  Search | Java FAQ | Recent Topics | Flagged Topics | Hot Topics | Zero Replies
Register / Login


Win a copy of Murach's Java Servlets and JSP this week in the Servlets forum!
JavaRanch » Java Forums » Certification » EJB Certification (SCBCD/OCPJBCD)
Bookmark "CMP relationship fields" Watch "CMP relationship fields" New topic
Author

CMP relationship fields

mprem kumar
Greenhorn

Joined: Apr 18, 2005
Posts: 2
The spec document[10.3.1] says that 'The accessor methods for the container-managed relationship fields must not be exposed in the remote interface of an entity bean', then, i have the following questions

1. Can the local interface contain methods that in turn accesses the relationship field accessor methods?

2. Can the remote interface contain methods that in turn accesses the
non-relationship field accessor methods?

Thanks.
Stefan Guilhen
Ranch Hand

Joined: Jul 31, 2004
Posts: 61
The answer is yes for both questions. The beans participating in a CMR must define local interfaces and the accessor methods that you define in the bean class use the local interface as parameter and return type. As a result, you cannot expose those methods in the remote interface because you are not allowed to expose local interfaces to remote clients.

Nothing prevents you from exposing them in the local interfaces, though. Also, the remote interfaces can expose the non-relationship field accessor methods. But keep in mind that if you are using CMP your accessor methods will be abstract and if you choose to expose them in the component interface you cannot perform additional steps like validation when they are called because the container will provide the implementation of the methods. For that reason, it is recommended that you define and expose your own pair of accessor methods that perform any additional steps and then call the abstract accessor methods.

Regards,
Stefan
[ April 18, 2005: Message edited by: Stefan Guilhen ]

SCJP 1.4, SCBCD 1.3<br />IBM 141, 484, 486
 
Don't get me started about those stupid light bulbs.
 
subject: CMP relationship fields
 
Similar Threads
HFEJB Final Exam Q-55
Is CMR field not persistent ?
Use of CMR fields from Client
container-managed relationship field
Question about Entity EJB Relationship, CMR field