Does anybody know why the container throws a TransactionInProgressException when met1() in the following bean is called ? I am trying to define transaction demarcation within the bean using the JMS API.
I know that the problem can be avoided by using commit|rollback in JTA instead of using commit|rollback from JMS. I just don't understand where the transaction is started. The transaction-type element in the deployment descriptor is Bean, so the container should not start a transaction when met1() is invoked.
Perhaps one should best avoid using commit|rollback from JDBC and JMS alltogether when one writes code which executes inside an EJB container?
Br, Sven T.
Joined: Jan 31, 2004
There was an error in the code in the previous post.