I have doubt regarding the return type of CMP/CMR fields.
1)no <field-type> tag in deployment descriptor. 2)Container will find from the abstract set and get methods
1)<CMR-FIELD-TYPE> tag availble in dd. 2)we need to declare the get and set abstract methods.
Why SUN handled CMR and CMP in different ways. in case of CMR fileds why to have a seperate tag for return type why cannot container finds from the abstract method return types.
posted 9 years ago
The only reason there is a CMR-FIELD-TYPE is for java.util.Collection or java.util.Set. If your CMR is return not a single value but collection then the DD lets you specify what is the return type. You dont need the CMR-FIELD-TYPE for a single value return (Say you are returning a String) This it will get from the abstract method return type.