This week's book giveaway is in the Mac OS forum.
We're giving away four copies of a choice of "Take Control of Upgrading to Yosemite" or "Take Control of Automating Your Mac" and have Joe Kissell on-line!
See this thread for details.
The moose likes EJB Certification (SCBCD/OCPJBCD) and the fly likes timers related doubt Big Moose Saloon
  Search | Java FAQ | Recent Topics | Flagged Topics | Hot Topics | Zero Replies
Register / Login


JavaRanch » Java Forums » Certification » EJB Certification (SCBCD/OCPJBCD)
Bookmark "timers related doubt" Watch "timers related doubt" New topic
Author

timers related doubt

Aditya Vasudeva
Ranch Hand

Joined: May 27, 2008
Posts: 76
in the spec it says that a timeout callback method must execute within a transaction.
Isn't it possible that the timer expires when a transaction is not active?
What would happen then? Is it therefore, necessary to mention a REQUIRED or REQUIRES_NEW for a timeout callback method??
Vinay Nath
Ranch Hand

Joined: Jul 06, 2008
Posts: 85
you are absolutely right, required and requires_new make sure when timeout method is called there is a new transaction created for the method when CMT is used.

I guess when using BMT you have to create a new transaction in the timeout method manually using userTransaction object but nothing abt it is mentioned in specs.


SCDJWS 5.0, SCBCD 5.0, SCWCD 5.0, SCJP 5.0
Aditya Vasudeva
Ranch Hand

Joined: May 27, 2008
Posts: 76
thanks for the explanation, vinay
 
GeeCON Prague 2014
 
subject: timers related doubt