| Author |
Default business interface
|
Joe Harry
Ranch Hand
Joined: Sep 26, 2006
Posts: 8795
|
|
|
If I implement an interface in my bean and if I do not annotate the interface, then is it assumed to be the Local interface?
|
SCJP 1.4, SCWCD 1.4 - Hints for you, SCBCD Hints - Demnachst, SCDJWS - Auch Demnachst
Did a rm -R / to find out that I lost my entire Linux installation!
|
 |
Mirko Bonasorte
Ranch Hand
Joined: May 14, 2007
Posts: 244
|
|
|
According to the specs (par. 4.6.6), it's true only if your session bean implements only one interface.
|
SCJP<br />SCWCD 1.4 Upgrade (Remember: me stupid)<br />SCWCD 1.4<br /><a href="http://jcp.org/aboutJava/communityprocess/final/jsr220/index.html" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">SCBCD 5.0</a><br /><a href="http://www.enthuware.com" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">SCBCD 5.0 mock exam</a> <br /> <br />SCEA 5 Part1: Preparing...
|
|
Joe Harry
Ranch Hand
Joined: Sep 26, 2006
Posts: 8795
|
|
|
So if my Session Bean implements a POJI, then the container assumes that the POJI is a Local interface for the Session bean. But if I implement more than one interface, then I have to explicitly annotate the POJI as Local or Remote. Am I right?
|
|
Mirko Bonasorte
Ranch Hand
Joined: May 14, 2007
Posts: 244
|
|
Yes.
In the specs paragraph above referred there is right your case 
|
|
Joe Harry
Ranch Hand
Joined: Sep 26, 2006
Posts: 8795
|
|
|
Thanks for the post!
|
|
 |
|
|
subject: Default business interface
|
|
|
0
