| Author |
Idempotent
|
Tom Tolman
Ranch Hand
Joined: Sep 02, 2004
Posts: 83
|
|
On the bottom of page 114 of HFSJ it says "The Http 1.1 spec declared GET, HEAD, and PUT as idempotents, even though you CAN write a non idempotent doGet() method yourself (but shouldn't). POST is considered idempotent by the HTTP 1.1 spec." Then immediately it says "POST is not idempotent" Is the first paragraph last line a typo, or is it that they are making a distinction between intention of server response vs the actuality of correct server response?
|
 |
Chandra Atla
Ranch Hand
Joined: Jul 21, 2004
Posts: 91
|
|
Hi Tom, The first paragraph's last line a typo. It's documented in the HFSJ errata. Here is the link to HFSJ Errata. http://www.oreilly.com/catalog/headservletsjsp/errata/ Thanks, Chandra
|
 |
Nicky Eng
Ranch Hand
Joined: Mar 26, 2005
Posts: 378
|
|
|
POST is non-idempotent
|
From NickyEng
Diploma in Computer Studies
SCJP 1.4
SCWCD 1.4
Formula 1 app by Maxis (Playbook)
|
 |
 |
|
|
subject: Idempotent
|
|
|