This week's book giveaway is in the OO, Patterns, UML and Refactoring forum. We're giving away four copies of Refactoring for Software Design Smells: Managing Technical Debt and have Girish Suryanarayana, Ganesh Samarthyam & Tushar Sharma on-line! See this thread for details.
A callback method, in the context of Web applications, is a method invoked by the container rather than by your own code. For example, you never invoke a servlet's service method yourself, instead the container does that for you when a client makes a request. In general, you'll write the callback method's implementation but never invoke it.
I imagine what's meant here by an "inline method" is one which you invoke directly in your own application's code: this may or may not be a method you have implemented yourself. For example, getServletConfig() is an "inline method" (I imagine). I may have that incorrect as I find it somewhat confusing terminology (for example, an invocation of an inline method in C++ is replaced by the expanded form of the method on compilation, a "feature" which doesn't exist in Java).
Not having a copy of HFSJ, it would have helped me (and others without the book) if you had quoted the relevant paragraph(s) - it would help to put your question in context.
Charles Lyons (SCJP 1.4, April 2003; SCJP 5, Dec 2006; SCWCD 1.4b, April 2004)
Author of OCEJWCD Study Companion for Oracle Exam 1Z0-899 (ISBN 0955160340 / AmazonAmazon UK )
Joined: Jul 05, 2007
the question in the book says:
Which are true about filters:
1) The destroy method is always a container callback. 2) the doFilter method is always a container callback. 3) The only way a filter can be invoked is through a DD declaration.
and it said that the options 1 and 3 are correct. 2 is not correct because doFilter is both a container callback and inline method.
destroy is only called b y container, but doFilter can also be indirectly invoked using chain.doFilter() while we are doing a filter chaining. so it becomes an inline method as well.
Charles, I think I get that now from your explanation. The book explanation is "inline" with what you said.