But as what Andrew said, if you had registered the exam (which took away other's opportunity), you should go for it. Your comments might be valuable to SUN.
I committed the mistake of assumming SCJA to be a "Sun Certified Junior Architect" and registered. If you are Ashish Sarin from Gurgaon Jug & friend of Raju bhai, please email me at kay_mahesh@yahoo.com .
Hi Nicholas,
I lost interest after reading comments on Java "experts" appearing for SCJA. Its true that I took away another candidate's oppurtunity, I tried to transfer the coupon, but that did not workout. I did not see any point in writing an exam without any interest.
Mikalai Zaikin
Ranch Hand
Joined: Jun 04, 2002
Posts: 2989
posted
0
Originally posted by Mahesh Kumaraguru:
I did not see any point in writing an exam without any interest.
It is really hard to say as this is the issue of rights and responsibility. If you pay for the test, while you give it up finally, it would be totally fine. However this is not the case.
Anyway, hoping that only a few guys behave like this. SUN might revise their beta policies, and we would be the guys who suffered finally.
Nick
Hong Anderson
Ranch Hand
Joined: Jul 05, 2005
Posts: 1936
posted
0
I think he has right to take or skip the exam.
SCJA 1.0, SCJP 1.4, SCWCD 1.4, SCBCD 1.3, SCJP 5.0, SCEA 5, SCBCD 5; OCUP - Fundamental, Intermediate and Advanced; IBM Certified Solution Designer - OOAD, vUML 2; SpringSource Certified Spring Professional
simon valter
Ranch Hand
Joined: May 16, 2004
Posts: 32
posted
0
yes and i think all the SCJP , SCJD and so on should have done the same... most come back saying how easy and fun this was... perhaps because the examn wasen't targeted at you... i just hope sun will have a way to filter those people out so some of the ones it was targeted at can pass.
0
