| Author |
no need to lock! ??
|
J Hartley
Ranch Hand
Joined: Mar 29, 2001
Posts: 52
|
|
Hi, from my FBN instructions.... "Note that the locking required is effectively a "write" lock only. If updates occur to a record that is being displayed on another client, then no change occurs at the other client. However, if two clients attempt to perform the sequence lock, read, modify, write, unlock concurrently, then both modification attempts will be handled correctly. The aim is to ensure that if two customers attempt to book a seat on the same flight concurrently, then the number of available seats is definitely reduced by two, unless there was only one seat, in which case, one customer will be advised at booking time that no more seats are available." i cant see the need to implement any locking. the modify method is synchronised, so for example client A sees that there is 1 seat left client B sees that there is 1 seat left client A calls modify client B calls modify Because client a called first it gets the lock from Data instance. the seats are reduced by 1. client A is happy Client B then gets the lock and enters the modify method, if there the seats = 0 then report failure, in this particular case it does. simple eh? am i missing something? Cheers Joe
|
 |
 |
|
|
subject: no need to lock! ??
|
|
|