File APIs for Java Developers
Manipulate DOC, XLS, PPT, PDF and many others from your application.
The moose likes Developer Certification (SCJD/OCMJD) and the fly likes Can a Vector be synchronized AGAIN???? Big Moose Saloon
  Search | Java FAQ | Recent Topics | Flagged Topics | Hot Topics | Zero Replies
Register / Login
JavaRanch » Java Forums » Certification » Developer Certification (SCJD/OCMJD)
Bookmark "Can a Vector be synchronized AGAIN????" Watch "Can a Vector be synchronized AGAIN????" New topic

Can a Vector be synchronized AGAIN????

Jay Jones

Joined: Oct 11, 2001
Posts: 14
I have seen the folowing code in this forum:

Since Vector is already synchronized, is synchronized (Vector) necessary ? What does it mean by synchronizing (synchronizing something)
Mark Spritzler

Joined: Feb 05, 2001
Posts: 17276

My suggestion is to use a HashSet instead, it works just like a Vector, and it is faster, one of the newer Collection objects, and cleaner than Vectors.
I would avoid Vectors and HashTables as they are from older versions of Java and the Newer Collections classes are newer. I actually had started using Vectors and Hashtables, since I knew them so well, but I changed them to the new Collections, and it actually reduced a bunch of my code.


Perfect World Programming, LLC - iOS Apps
How to Ask Questions the Smart Way FAQ
Aaron Hible

Joined: Jul 30, 2001
Posts: 2
First, to answer your question about synchronization you might look at the postings under Threads and Synchronization.
Second, it looks like the author of the above code is trying to prevent any other threads from accessing the vector until this thread done with his while loop. Though the Vector is synchronized and only be accessed by one thread at a time, in this case if it was not in a sync block another thread could manipulate the vector (add, remove, removeall, etc) any where in the while loop.
Third, I would take Mr. Mark Spritzler's advice in the earlier posting and not use Vectors.
Good luck, threading/synching can be tricky to understand and debug.
I agree. Here's the link:
subject: Can a Vector be synchronized AGAIN????
It's not a secret anymore!