Hi All, Is there any need to keep a mapping of remote clients to connections (assuming each client gets its own unique connection)? The only reason I can think of is so that you only create a connection object once per server session for any unique client. Thanks for your opinions Michael Morris
Any intelligent fool can make things bigger, more complex, and more violent. It takes a touch of genius - and a lot of courage - to move in the opposite direction. - Ernst F. Schumacher
I don't see why you would need that. I always looked as the Connection Object as a client proxy, or a client stand-in. It represented a single client on the server. So the mapping was done for me by RMI and Remote, so I didn't have to do any kind of mapping. Mark
Hi Mark, Thanks for the responce (that's what I was hoping you would say.) I should be finishing up on the server this week. Get ready for a barage of client/GUI questions Thanks againg Michael Morris
0
