aspose file tools
The moose likes Developer Certification (SCJD/OCMJD) and the fly likes NX: another question Big Moose Saloon
  Search | Java FAQ | Recent Topics
Register / Login
JavaRanch » Java Forums » Certification » Developer Certification (SCJD/OCMJD)
Reply Bookmark "NX: another question" Watch "NX: another question" New topic
Author

NX: another question

Manoj Gundawar
Ranch Hand

Joined: Nov 17, 2002
Posts: 169
Assignment: Housing Contractor
Question:
Suppose 5 clients request for a perticuler record to read. As I am no planning to lock the records while reading, they will be displayed for all of them at the same time.
But if one of them then modify this record, then what about the remaining four? Thier terminal will still show the old non updated record. What to do in that case? Is this allowed ?
Thanks,
manoj
[ July 24, 2003: Message edited by: Jmannu gundawar ]

Manoj<br />SCJP, SCJD, SCWCD, IBM WSAD.
Bob Reeves
Ranch Hand

Joined: May 01, 2003
Posts: 64
Hi Jmannu:
If you update the four other users when one edits a record, then you're doing "live update". This feature is far beyond what I think the assignment requires.
Live update is appropriate in software that you can charge money for since it is much more complex!
Tx
Manoj Gundawar
Ranch Hand

Joined: Nov 17, 2002
Posts: 169
Hi Bob,
So I can assume that the display of non updated record at the other client is fine.
Just wanted to check that part.
Thanks for ur answer.
manoj
Bob Reeves
Ranch Hand

Joined: May 01, 2003
Posts: 64
Hi Jmannu:
No, I don't think many -- if any -- developers are updating other users when a record is edited.
PS: If you have concerns, be sure to document them in your choices/design document.
Tx
 
I agree. Here's the link: http://ej-technologies/jprofiler - if it wasn't for jprofiler, we would need to run our stuff on 16 servers instead of 3.
 
subject: NX: another question
 
Similar Threads
Oracle 9i Personal Edition password.
WLS7.0 admin console cannot be accessed
NX: Question from a rookie: contractor assignment
help me on output of this code
configuration details of commons-configuration