Hi All, I wanted to implement a simple sorting for the JTable (I have cursed sun at least 1,000,000 times for not providing that)
I implemented a simple single level sorting taking help from the TableSorter from the Examples. But there is a small complication.
when there are many rows with same values i just leave the order as it is. But now if i sort it based on column 1 first and then go to column 2 then the order is different and if i go to column 3 first and then to column 2 then t order is different
Well, your problem must be that you are not extending your own TableModel. In my implementation I extended AbstracTableModel and instead of using a Vector of String objects with independent columns I use a List of Hotels [List<Hotel>] as the model of the TableModel.
Therefore every line in my TableModel is whole value object.
Early in my implementation I created Comparators for all the Hotel fields (name, location, rate, size, date, etc).
So, in my TableModel I do not order a particular column, I order the whole collection of Hotels using a Comparator. Somewhat like:
That sorts my List<Hotel> using a particular comparator and evidently all the colums are displayed accordinginly in the JTable. [ October 21, 2006: Message edited by: Edwin Dalorzo ]
Joined: Feb 26, 2006
Thanks Edwin, I too have done something similar to what you are telling. But the problem that i am facing i will explain Suppose there are three rows (simplified though)
So you see that after the step 2 of both the variations even though i am sorting the column 2 and it indeed is sorted but yet the rows with the same City will not be having the same order as it depends on which column was selected earlier.
I was wanting to know if that is fine as long as sorting is done correctly on the column 2 [ October 21, 2006: Message edited by: Sam Codean ]