It's not a secret anymore!*
The moose likes Developer Certification (SCJD/OCMJD) and the fly likes RMI - general question Big Moose Saloon
  Search | Java FAQ | Recent Topics | Flagged Topics | Hot Topics | Zero Replies
Register / Login
JavaRanch » Java Forums » Certification » Developer Certification (SCJD/OCMJD)
Bookmark "RMI - general question" Watch "RMI - general question" New topic
Author

RMI - general question

Dannie Kjeldgaard
Greenhorn

Joined: Oct 02, 2006
Posts: 7
I decided to try implementing my solution with RMI, which I have never tried to use before. it seems very simple to implement, which will not be a problem. My question is more general:

Do you usually implement the ServicesImpl class as a singleton, or is it more common to allow more of those?

Best regards
Dannie
Mark Smyth
Ranch Hand

Joined: Feb 04, 2004
Posts: 288
Originally posted by Dannie Kjeldgaard:
I decided to try implementing my solution with RMI, which I have never tried to use before. it seems very simple to implement, which will not be a problem. My question is more general:

Do you usually implement the ServicesImpl class as a singleton, or is it more common to allow more of those?

Best regards
Dannie


Can I take it that your ServicesImpl class is the network database server? In general I would say that unless you are absolutely certain that there can only ever be one instance of a class then it is best not to implement the singleton pattern. Instead if you bind only one such object to the rmi registry instead there will be only one instance of the ServicesImpl for remote clients to access anyway.

Mark


SCJP<br />SCJD
 
I agree. Here's the link: http://aspose.com/file-tools
 
subject: RMI - general question
 
Similar Threads
NX: Does URLyBird need a multi-threaded server?
URLyBird - Data Interface
RMI Callback - Help Needed!
Question on rmiregistry
controlling internet access