permaculture playing cards
The moose likes Developer Certification (SCJD/OCMJD) and the fly likes B&S deleteRecord Big Moose Saloon
  Search | Java FAQ | Recent Topics | Flagged Topics | Hot Topics | Zero Replies
Register / Login
JavaRanch » Java Forums » Certification » Developer Certification (SCJD/OCMJD)
Bookmark "B&S deleteRecord " Watch "B&S deleteRecord " New topic

B&S deleteRecord

Harish Yerneni
Ranch Hand

Joined: Sep 15, 2004
Posts: 94
Hi all:

Here is the spec I got

I have checked for RNFE if the record is not existing in FileManager hashmap or already marked as deleted. I have thrown security exception, when cookie is not matching with the existing cookie in the hashmap or if recno doesnt exist in the lockManager hashmap itself(question: am I OK here).

I have seen in many posts they are recommending
lockRecord() - can somebody explain me why we should use lockRecord() here. I am thinking we are deleting an already locked record. If we use lockRecord(), dont we get a new cookie value here.
deleteRecord() - fine
unlock() - fine

Here is what I have coded in my Data.class



question: Why should we lock() first, if the record is already

SCJP 1.4 | SCWCD 1.4 | SCJD (WIP)
mohamed sulibi
Ranch Hand

Joined: Sep 04, 2005
Posts: 169

i don't understand your question , but i think the sequence for calling client is:

SCJP, SCJD in progress ...
I agree. Here's the link:
subject: B&S deleteRecord
It's not a secret anymore!