Hi all, Everybody here are doing a splended job. Thanks to Internet. Please see the code below,
I have defined two methods one takes int and another takes long. There is no problem here and output is Int Version : 10 But when i put one of the methods in another class and do a inheritance, see code below
This is giving compile time error Reference to method is ambigious, It is defined in void method(long) and void method(int). This ambiguity should have arised in the earlier code itself but it is rightly taking the int method. Why is that, problem arises only in inheritance. It is a instance of overloading. Also if I interchange the method declerations and change it as public void method(long i) in the superclass call and public void method(int i) in the subclass callsub It is able to give the output Int Version : 10 Also I am not able to call the int method in the superclass at all from the subclass. Can you folks please explain this behaviour. Your help is highly appreciated. [I added UBB CODE tags to your source code to make it more readable. Please try to use them in the future. Learn more about UBB codes - Ajith]
[This message has been edited by Ajith Kallambella (edited September 26, 2000).]
Hi all ! I think this is an interesting question. Can someone come up with an explanatiopn for this. All I can tell is: For overloading in a class, the most specific method is choosen. But with the 2nd case, it'd be nice if someone came with an explanation. -sampaths
When determining if there is a maximally specific method, the compiler uses not only the types of the arguments, but also the type of the definer In the second example above, the versions of method defined in call and callSub are both maximally specific. 'call's method is not more specific than 'callsub's because the class 'call' cannot be converted to the class 'callsub' by method invocation conversion. callsub's method is not more specific than 'call's because the type long cannot be converted to int by method invocation conversion. Since there is more than one maximally specific method, according JLS section 126.96.36.199 Choose the Most Specific Method we have an ambiguity. Look at these two posts in Sun's bug parade for more detailed explanation - Note 4038412 Note 4067106 Hope this helps, Ajith
Open Group Certified Distinguished IT Architect. Open Group Certified Master IT Architect. Sun Certified Architect (SCEA).
Joined: Sep 26, 2000
Thanks Ajith for the reply. But My brain could not catch hold the line "'call's method is not more specific than 'callsub's because the class 'call' cannot be converted to the class 'callsub' by method invocation conversion" If possible can you explain me more about that. I get the point that the subclass mthods should be more specific than the superclass methods. Am I right? Thanks for your time.