Here is from the e-mail I got from Sun's Troia Parson [Troia.Parson@central.sun.com]: Hello, October 4 2000 (is the date to start new test---added by VW) Frequently Asked Questions for Revised Programmer 2 exam.
Q-Are the testing objectives different? A- No. There may be some minor revisions for clarification but the testing objectives will remain basically the same. We are still testing the same subject matter Q-Does the new exam cover the jdk 1.3? A-There are no changes to the core programming language that we test on the programmer exam. Q-Is the new exam more difficult? A-We have made every effort to keep the level of difficulty consistent with the original Java 2 exam.
Q-Why is the pass score different? A-To insure the level of difficulty is the same we needed to adjust the pass score for the revised exam.
Q-What is a Borderline Survey? A-There is now a survey at the beginning of the exam called a Borderline. This survey allows us to collect information on the candidate's experience as a programmer. That information is used to determine how are exams are performing. In short, it allows us to create and maintain the highest standard in our examinations. Giving honest answers to this survey is essential. Q- What are the new Certification requirements? A-Certification requirements - Candidates must take one knowledge-based exam: Prometric test number: 310-025 Exam type: Multiple choice/Free Response Number of questions: 59 Passing score: 61% Pre-requisites: None Time limit: 90 minutes Recommended price: $150.00
This revision of the Sun Certified Programmer for Java 2 Platform does not require an upgrade for candidates who have already certified for Java 2. The subject matter tested on the examination has not changed. The candidate's taking the revised exam will received the exact same credential as those certified on the original Java 2 exam. ********** Certification Customers ********** Sun Educational Services offers a variety of tools to help you in your career. By logging on to our Certification database, you can find grades for the examiniations you have taken; confirm or update your address, email, phone number; track your certification progress, and submit questions to the Sun Educational Certification department from this location. This assistance is avalilable online at www.galton.com/~sun/URL] Your emails will be responded to as quickly as possible, sending additional emails to us throughthe database, or by any other alias is not necessary. **********Certification Customers **********
[This message has been edited by maha anna (edited September 26, 2000).]
Stephen Pride
Ranch Hand
Joined: Sep 14, 2000
Posts: 121
posted
0
Passing score is a 61%??? From reading the FAQ for the new test, it seems like it is equivalent (in substance) to the old test, so I wonder why the passing score dropped 10%. Regards, SP
SCJP
Anonymous
Ranch Hand
Joined: Nov 22, 2008
Posts: 18944
posted
0
Maybe they want more people to pass the exam? Maybe the exam has more questions on IO streams and sockets? The beta exam maybe was more difficult and they want the pass to fail ratio the same with the reg. java 1.2 and 1.1 and 1.0 tests?
Or It maybe a combo of all 3 ? Has anyone taken a 1.1 or 1.2 test and has also taken the beta a month or 2 ago and what do you think?
Madhav Lakkapragada
Ranch Hand
Joined: Jun 03, 2000
Posts: 5040
posted
0
Originally posted by Stephen Pride: so I wonder why the passing score dropped 10%. SP
SP: Not sure if this cought your attn. Time Limit: 90 mins. vs the 120 min for the old test. Regds. - satya
Thanks for the info and a special one to Madhav Lakkapragada to spot that time limit. Thanks for the info once again
Stephen Pride
Ranch Hand
Joined: Sep 14, 2000
Posts: 121
posted
0
Actually, I did catch the time limit thinking that it may be the lone contributor. However, after taking about 20 mock exams thus far and using (usually) about an hour to complete it, I figured it may have been only a small factor. But hey, if that is the only reason for the 10% drop in the passing score, I actually feel a little more relieved. ;-) Regards, SP