This week's book giveaway is in the Mac OS forum.
We're giving away four copies of a choice of "Take Control of Upgrading to Yosemite" or "Take Control of Automating Your Mac" and have Joe Kissell on-line!
See this thread for details.
The moose likes Performance and the fly likes collection.size() vs. array.length Big Moose Saloon
  Search | Java FAQ | Recent Topics | Flagged Topics | Hot Topics | Zero Replies
Register / Login


JavaRanch » Java Forums » Java » Performance
Bookmark "collection.size() vs. array.length" Watch "collection.size() vs. array.length" New topic
Author

collection.size() vs. array.length

paul wheaton
Trailboss

Joined: Dec 14, 1998
Posts: 20586
    ∞

In the article at http://java.oreilly.com/news/javaperf_0900.html the advantages of not having collection.size() used in the for loop are pointed out. Would this apply equally to array.length?


permaculture Wood Burning Stoves 2.0 - 4-DVD set
Jack Shirazi
Author
Ranch Hand

Joined: Oct 26, 2000
Posts: 96
No. Java arrays (e.g. char[], Object[], not collection objects) cannot change size. So the value is a constant for any one array, and the loop has a constant value to compare against. The problem with collection.size() is that it makes a method call for every iteration of the loop.
 
GeeCON Prague 2014
 
subject: collection.size() vs. array.length