aspose file tools*
The moose likes Performance and the fly likes Object Cloning and performance? Big Moose Saloon
  Search | Java FAQ | Recent Topics | Flagged Topics | Hot Topics | Zero Replies
Register / Login
JavaRanch » Java Forums » Java » Performance
Bookmark "Object Cloning and performance?" Watch "Object Cloning and performance?" New topic
Author

Object Cloning and performance?

Max Tomlinson
Ranch Hand

Joined: Jul 17, 2001
Posts: 365
Hi all-
I have been tasked with optimizing an MQ message transport package my company uses. The package consists of a configurable MQImpl class (taking a properties file) and two support classes (one for Put, one for Get). I've already implemented IBM's MQ Connection pooling, which shaves quite a bit of time (about half) off the MQImpl instantiation but there's still a fair amount of time taken to create the objects themselves.
My questions:
a) can I create a template type object for MQImpl and clone it for requests? Is that faster?
b) also, if I make the support classes (Put and Get) inner classes to the MQImpl object (probably a cleaner design, something I'm tempted to do), is that faster or slower overall?
This project will be using both IBM and SUN jvms in production.
thanks in advance,
Max Tomlinson
 
It is sorta covered in the JavaRanch Style Guide.
 
subject: Object Cloning and performance?