my dog learned polymorphism*
The moose likes Performance and the fly likes Compiles: 131 vs. 140 Big Moose Saloon
  Search | Java FAQ | Recent Topics | Flagged Topics | Hot Topics | Zero Replies
Register / Login


JavaRanch » Java Forums » Java » Performance
Bookmark "Compiles: 131 vs. 140" Watch "Compiles: 131 vs. 140" New topic
Author

Compiles: 131 vs. 140

Guy Allard
Ranch Hand

Joined: Nov 24, 2000
Posts: 776
Hi - I have a system I am building using Ant. Sun compilers.
Have about 190 source files, and 4 jars are output from the build.
On the box I am using, when I build with 131 compiler, the full build runs in about 12-13 secs.
When I use 140 compiler, it takes 19-20 secs.
Has any one else seen this magnitude of hit between the two compilers?
Regards, Guy
Thomas Smets
Ranch Hand

Joined: Dec 11, 2001
Posts: 111
I have no idea as the code should be the same (no 1.4 specific feature used). If you are really in strong need for performance in the compilation process, IBM has a little class that greatly improved the compilation speed !
It's name is JIKES :
Ibm's Jikes page as found by google
Try using it !
Please note that VM's version are not sufficient to find what JVM you use, as IBM has it's own set of home bread compiler which are usually a very good match to Sun's.
[ April 15, 2002: Message edited by: Thomas SMETS ]

Thomas Smets
Just another developper
 
I agree. Here's the link: http://aspose.com/file-tools
 
subject: Compiles: 131 vs. 140