File APIs for Java Developers
Manipulate DOC, XLS, PPT, PDF and many others from your application.
The moose likes Programmer Certification (SCJP/OCPJP) and the fly likes I cant believe my eyes? Big Moose Saloon
  Search | Java FAQ | Recent Topics | Flagged Topics | Hot Topics | Zero Replies
Register / Login

Win a copy of EJB 3 in Action this week in the EJB and other Java EE Technologies forum!
JavaRanch » Java Forums » Certification » Programmer Certification (SCJP/OCPJP)
Bookmark "I cant believe my eyes?" Watch "I cant believe my eyes?" New topic

I cant believe my eyes?

james gong
Ranch Hand

Joined: May 29, 2001
Posts: 48

public class ADirtyOne
private final int i =10;
private byte k = i;


I had thought the code wouldn't compile(it need a explicit cast),but when I compile ,it compile clearly without any warning.
I thought the int is wide than byte ,so when convert a int to a byte ,need a explicit cast( private byte k=(byte)i
Am I right?
Guoqiao Sun
Ranch Hand

Joined: Jul 18, 2001
Posts: 317
Hi, james, the compiler takes initialised final primitive variables as constants, so you code is the same as:

Note that the following code does not compile:

when the final identifier is removed.
Hope it helps.

[This message has been edited by Guoqiao Sun (edited July 31, 2001).]

Guoqiao Sun<br />SCJP2 SCWCD2<br />Creator of <a href="" target="_blank" rel="nofollow"></a>, Java resource, mock exam, forum
Ashish Hareet
Ranch Hand

Joined: Jul 14, 2001
Posts: 375
Hi James,
private final int i = 127;
byte k = i ;
This will compile . The reason being that 127 fit's as a byte & the fact that i is final which means it won't change throughout it's lifetime .
Now try
private final int i = 128;
byte k = i ;
This won't compile cause i doesn't fit the byte range .
Ragu Sivaraman
Ranch Hand

Joined: Jul 20, 2001
Posts: 464
Bottom line... check for 2 things
1. Range of values
2. Final declaration
int i = 127;
byte b = i; //This will never compile unless explicitly casted
//or make i as final
byte b = 127; //Narrowing conversion looks for only for range
I agree. Here's the link:
subject: I cant believe my eyes?
Similar Threads
Can we have forward refrencing with final instance variable
why we do not require explicit casting at line no.3
who can explain me this please ??
Abhilash's Site ( Explicit Cast Is Not Needed in Some Cases )