If you do not "catch" the exception, you must declare that you did not just *forget* to catch it. You must either "catch" or throw it. "finally" is not sufficient for that purpose.
Is it true that checked exception should either be declare as "throws" in the method header or catch specifically with that type of Exception(or with Exception as superclass of all exception)? Why finally is not sufficient enough to handle Exceptions? --Farooq [This message has been edited by Muhammad Farooq (edited August 28, 2001).]
Muhammad Farooq<br />Sun Certified Programmer for Java 2 Platform<br />Oracle8i Certified Professional Database Administrator